E3950 vs J3455 vs Gemini Lake
Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 4:42 pm
Hello,
There are two versions of the Fitlet2 CPU option that are quite similar (core number, frequency range):
- Atom x7-E3950
- Celeron J3455
However the J3455 seems to be slightly faster and it gets better benchmark scores.
How is it that the J3455 version is less expensive than the E3950 one then? What is the point of purchasing the E3950 version? Does it have more features in compensation? Or am I missing something?
And an additional question if I may: is a Gemini Lake upgrade planned for the Fitlet2 (which is Apollo Lake-based) in the near future? The Goldmont Plus CPU core has some interesting improvements, namely:
- better performance (in general and with AES encryption)
- revamped GPU with better video hardware acceleration support
The Pentium Silver J5005 would make a nice addition to the Fitlet lineup but would probably require a motherboard redesign for DDR4 support.
There are two versions of the Fitlet2 CPU option that are quite similar (core number, frequency range):
- Atom x7-E3950
- Celeron J3455
However the J3455 seems to be slightly faster and it gets better benchmark scores.
How is it that the J3455 version is less expensive than the E3950 one then? What is the point of purchasing the E3950 version? Does it have more features in compensation? Or am I missing something?
And an additional question if I may: is a Gemini Lake upgrade planned for the Fitlet2 (which is Apollo Lake-based) in the near future? The Goldmont Plus CPU core has some interesting improvements, namely:
- better performance (in general and with AES encryption)
- revamped GPU with better video hardware acceleration support
The Pentium Silver J5005 would make a nice addition to the Fitlet lineup but would probably require a motherboard redesign for DDR4 support.